Feeds:
Posts
Comments

If you have spent much time in a Salvation Army store, you may have heard a peculiar sound.

I heard it one afternoon when I accompanied my wife, Robin, to the Salvation Army Depot in Hornell. As Robin eagerly examined the dresses and blouses, hoping to find something from J. Jill or Eileen Fisher, I cast a desultory look at the polo shirts and tee-shirts, the vests and forlorn tweeds. Finding little to whet my appetite, I turned my attention to the sounds in the store.

What I heard was a low, continuous scraping. Was it a knife being sharpened? A blade removing paint? The sound was metallic, arhythmic, and vaguely abrasive, but it held my attention, in a way that the polo shirts had not. What was I hearing? Was it someone pushing a rusty cart down the aisle?

A few moments later, the answer dawned on me. What I was hearing was the sound of metal hangers—as many as a dozen—being pushed along metal rods, as the shoppers looked for bargains. From time to time the sound would diminish, as someone found a promising item. Then it would pick up again. The more I listened, the more varied and pleasing the sound became. Although it had probably always been there, I had never noticed it before.

Quite possibly I was listening because I had nothing better to do. But to listen to what is occurring, within and without, is an important aspect of Zen training. And to listen without immediately knowing—or trying to know—what one is hearing is itself an instructive practice.

It is natural, of course, to want to name what we hear. Unidentified sounds, particularly loud or sudden sounds, can be disconcerting, as Alfred Hitchcock well understood. When something goes bump in the night, it unnerves us, at least until we discern that it was not an intruder but the snow shovel falling and hitting the deck. Having solved that mystery, we can go back to sleep.

In Zen practice, however, the point is to be awake: to be aware of whatever is going on, moment by moment, and to be intimate with our experience. Our accumulated knowledge, however valuable, can stand in the way of that objective, as can our habits of defining, naming, and comparing. To have a concept of a sound is one thing, to have an experience of that sound another. The concept may give us comfort, but the experience returns us to the reality of our lives.

Waking at six in the morning, we hear the song of a bird. Is it a house wren? A Carolina wren? Some kind of warbler?

Listening again, we drop the effort to know what we are hearing—or to show off our knowledge to ourselves. We enjoy a moment of wonder and pure listening. In the language of Zen, we savor the “suchness” of the song, its transitory presence in the stream of time.

Such moments are central to Zen practice, not least because they open us to a spacious, immovable awareness, within which we can observe both our immediate experience and our lifelong conditioning: our urge to label whatever we encounter. Such moments are fostered by quiet sitting, but they can occur at any time and any place, be it a darkened zendo or the well-lit aisles of the Salvation Army.

11. Mindful Wading

I have a friend who’s obssessed with fish. Or, more precisely, he’s obsessed with fly fishing. So far as I can tell, when he is not fishing, he is thinking about fish. His license plate reads “Red Trout.” So does his e-mail alias. I suspect that he also dreams about fish, and when he closes his eyes it’s not Renoir’s bathers or Rubens’ nudes but red trout that swim up to greet him.

As some of you may have guessed, I am speaking of Richard Thompson, a painter of national renown, who recently retired from the School of Art and Design at Alfred University. Now he devotes his days to painting and fishing in (I think) that order.

Not long ago, Richard painted a series of pictures entitled “Mindful Wading.” These paintings feature a fly fisherman in hat and waders making his way across a stream. The paintings were inspired by a conversation with my wife (who suggested to Richard that he take up yoga and meditation) and informed by Zen master Thich Nhat Hanh’s The Long Road Turns to Joy, a pocket guide to walking meditation. As Thich Nhat Hanh explains, “Walking meditation is walking just for the sake of walking.” Mindful wading is Richard’s version of the practice.

In one of Richard’s paintings, a circular panel called“Cross Currents,” the fisherman stands in the center with outstretched arms. In one hand he holds his rod, in the other his line. His feet are poised on the bed of the stream, surrounded by rocks, and he appears to be stepping gingerly, lest he stumble and fall. Above his head and to either side, the heads of trout are surfacing, each lunging toward a fly. Superimposed on five contrasting colors—yellow, red, blue, and two shades of green—the image feels both centered and kinetic. Viewed from a distance, the painting itself resembles a pinwheel.

“I fly fish,” Richard has written, “and I wade streams. When I am crossing a stream I can’t see the bottom, and the water is moving. I have to balance myself while testing each rock for stability. I do this navigating under low light and in bad weather and often on unfamiliar streams. I do mindful wading.”

Thich Nhat Hanh might be surprised to learn of Richard’s adaptation of his practice, but I suspect that he would approve. For the practice of walking meditation, as interpreted by Thich Nhat Hanh, is more than a respite from the rigors of zazen. It is a practice in its own right, whose purpose is to cultivate awareness of our bodies, our surroundings, and our changing states of mind. Beyond that, it is also a way of developing inner peace and a non-violent attitude toward our natural environment. Walking mindfully, we notice whether our steps are anxious or peaceful, and we cultivate the latter.

If you would like to practice walking meditation, select a place where you will not be observed or disturbed. Open your senses to your surroundings. Assume an upright but flexible posture, letting your shoulders drop and your belly soften. Relax into your breathing. Then walk naturally and unhurriedly, as though you had no destination, feeling the bottoms of your feet pressing the ground. Continue this practice for fifteen minutes or more, maintaining mindfulness all the while. If your mind wanders, gently bring it back.

As you become more skillful in this practice, you may wish to extend it into the public arena, increasing the tempo so as not to call attention to yourself. Let the practice restore your peace, your grace, and your dignity, as you walk—or wade—through your day.

If you have been reading this column, perhaps you have noticed that it sometimes appears across from the Classified Ads. Perhaps this has given you pause.

Zen is a meditative tradition of high purpose and great antiquity. What is a column on Zen doing across from an ad for Happy Jack Skin Balm? (Happy Jack “promotes healing and hair growth on dogs & cats without steroids!”).

Zen is a late flowering of an even older spiritual tradition, whose foundational principles are known as the Four Noble Truths and the Noble Eightfold Path. What is a column on Zen doing across from an ad for Brown’s Septic Service? (“Septic tanks pumped. Repairs and installations. . . Visa and MasterCard accepted”).

Zen is concerned with the interdependence of all living beings, the impermanence of all conditioned things, and the suffering caused by a fundamental ignorance of reality. It is especially concerned with the Great Matter of life and death. What is a column on Zen doing across from ads for a floral-pattern love seat priced at $ 350, “I Love Alfred” bumper stickers at $ 1.50 each, and power scooters at “ABSOLUTELY NO COST TO YOU!!”?”

Nothing, one might say. If this column ends up across from the classifieds, it’s because the editor of this paper, who was kind enough to include the column in the first place, had to put it somewhere.

A more accurate answer, however, is that Zen has everything to do with the classifieds—or, more broadly, with the mundane business of daily life. For unless one chooses to renounce our materialistic culture and become a monk or nun, Zen practice must somehow be integrated with a world where cats and dogs develop allergies, septic tanks need be pumped, and love seats are bought and sold.

To be sure, meditative training is traditionally conducted in tranquil surroundings, where the lights are dim and the distractions few. Sitting quietly in the zendo, or perhaps at home in a space reserved for meditation, we settle into stillness. We learn to rest in simple presence, or what Zen calls the clear open sky of awareness. Thoughts cross our minds, but if we do not pursue them, they pass like clouds in the clear open sky. And when our sitting ends, we return to our lives feeling cleansed and refreshed.

Such respites nourish us, and they are not to be discounted. But the deeper value—and the higher challenge—of meditative practice lies in the integration of our experience in meditation with our experience of everyday life. With practice and proper training, we can learn to quiet our minds. We can learn to be still. But with patience and persistence, we can also learn to maintain stillness in the midst of external hubbub and meditative awareness in the midst of emotional turmoil.

In his new book, The Wise Heart, Jack Kornfield reminds us that there are “two distinct dimensions to our life: the ever-changing flow of experiences, and that which knows the experiences.”* Cultivating the latter, we can learn to trust in “that which knows”: in an awareness that isn’t angry when we are angry or depressed when we’re depressed. It is merely present, sustaining us through joy and sorrow alike. Within that spacious awareness, pleasant and not-so-pleasant mind states come and go, as do the cats and dogs, the love seats and power scooters of our quotidian world. Aware of them all, we enlarge our sense of self. Embracing them all, we renew our connection with life.

_____________

* Jack Kornfield, The Wise Heart (Bantam, 2008), 42.

9. Just This

In the sometimes cryptic utterances of the Zen masters two plain words are often to be heard. Considered singly, they define two distinct aspects of Zen meditation. Considered together, they point to the core of the practice.

The first of these words is just, as in the Zen saying, “When you walk, just walk. When you eat, just eat.”

In its most common adverbial usage, just means “no more than,” and it serves to limit its object. “That’s just George being George,” we might say of an eccentric uncle. “Oh, that’s just my arthritis acting up again,” we might say to ourselves.

As used in Zen practice, just conveys a similar meaning, but it also connotes a wholehearted, one-pointed concentration. When you walk, just walk, giving full attention to your walking. When you eat, do the same. In contrast to so-called multi-tasking, the word just exhorts us to do one thing at a time, and to give undivided attention to whatever we are doing. A person washing the dishes just to wash the dishes is cultivating this quality of attention. A person watching CNN while walking on the treadmill is doing the very opposite.

No less than just, the pronoun this holds a promiment place in the lexicon of Zen. This is everywhere,” we read in the Diamond Sutra, “without differentiation or degree.” “Zen is this,”writes Roshi Bernie Glassman, “this moment, this stick, this thisness.” The word may also be found in the Zen slogan “This is it” and the Zen koan “What is this?” In all of these instances, this adverts to whatever is present, right here, right now. More specifically, it refers to undifferentiated reality, prior to the imposition of concepts, opinions, or dualistic thinking generally.

Stepping outdoors in early March, we feel the heat of the sun. We may go on to check the thermometer, or describe the day as unseasonably warm, or attribute the unseasonable weather to global warming. But before any of that occurs, we feel the heat of the sun. By saying “this is it,” we remind ourselves to be present for that transitory experience. And by asking “what is this?” (followed, in Zen training, with “I don’t know”), we challenge our preconceptions and open ourselves to the depth of our experience.

Taken separately, just and this represent the two main components of meditative practice, which are often described as “stopping” (samatha) and “looking” (vipassana). Taken together, they form the slogan “just this,” which, as James Austin observes in his Zen-Brain Reflections, offers a key to understanding and a practical tool for meditation. Practicing with just, we gather our energies; practicing with this, we bring our gathered energies to the penetration of reality. If the first trains us to focus on the one thing we are doing, the second invites us to look deeply into the present moment.*

If you would like to try this practice, seat yourself in a comfortable, upright posture. Place your mind on your breathing. With your in-breath, say just silently to yourself. With your out-breath, say this. As you breathe in, feel the concentration of your energies; as you breathe out, surrender yourself to whatever you’re experiencing. Continue this practice for several minutes, encountering this, this, this, just as it is.

_______________

*James H. Austin, Zen-Brain Reflections (MIT Press, 2006), 33-37.

Imre, a three-year-old friend of mine, delights in kicking things. When my wife and I gave him a set of educational blocks, of the sort that are supposed to develop eye-hand coordination, Imre took a few minutes to build a tower, then merrily kicked it across the room. Perhaps he was learning eye-foot coordination. Perhaps he has a future in the NFL.

One morning, Imre’s mother invited us over for a Sunday brunch. As we and a few other grown-ups were tucking into a delicious custard pie, Imre decided it was time to run around the table, dragging his wooden train and yelling at the top of his lungs. It was difficult to hear ourselves think, let alone carry on a conversation.

Fortunately, I’d come prepared. Earlier that morning, as I was pouring my Cheerios into a bowl, a blue matchbox car dropped out of the box. Foreseeing its possible use, I had stashed it in my pocket.

Armed with that equipment, I stopped Imre in his tracks. “I have a present for you,” I said, “but if you want it you will have to sit still for one minute”.

Regarding me quizzically, Imre agreed to the deal, and for the next forty seconds, he sat more or less still, chuckling all the while. Apparently, sitting still struck him as a silly idea, but he was willing to go along. And having kept his end of the bargain, he received his car, which, he soon discovered, he could happily crash into the walls and furniture.

I tell this story partly to illustrate that sitting still, however rare it may be in our culture, is something even a rambunctious three-year-old can do. If you are reading this column, you must be older than three, and you can do it too.

However, if you are thinking that by doing Zen meditation you will receive an immediate reward, you may well be disappointed. It is true that even twenty minutes of zazen can leave us cleansed and refreshed. And over time, Zen practitioners experience such benefits as heightened clarity and concentration, sharpened intuition, and greater emotional stability. But to sit in zazen with goals and expectations is not only to invite frustration. It is also a sure-fire way to undermine one’s effort.

In practicing Zen meditation, we sit still and return to the ground of being. We step back from our usual mental activities: defining, preferring, judging, or comparing this to that. Those activities may continue, but we merely watch them, and if we can, we drop them altogether. In so doing, we open ourselves to the experience of pure seeing, pure hearing, prior to names, goals, plans, and expectations. In the words of Zen master Kosho Uchiyama, we experience “what is there before [we] cook it up with thought.”* We enter the stream of life just as it is, not as we would have it be.

That is not so easily done. A lifetime of Western conditioning militates against it. But for those who persist, the practice of zazen becomes its own reward. In the language of Zen, by forgetting the self and its endless expectations, we “awaken to the ten thousand things.” And whether those things be toy cars or custard pies, we see, hear, and taste them as never before.

__________

*Kosho Uchiyama, Opening the Hand of Thought (Wisdom, 2004), 30.

Today I am writing this column with my Sailor 1911 fountain pen. Its name commemorates the origin of the Sailor Pen Company, which was founded in 1911 by Mr. Kyugoro Sakata of Hiroshima, Japan. Having learned about fountain pens from a British sailor, Mr. Sakata started his own company, naming it after his source of inspiration. My Sailor 1911 is plum-colored and sports a gold-plated nib, from which the black ink flows freely. A gift from my wife, it is a pleasure to use and a handsome object in its own right.

Yet my pen is also a composite thing, and when I take it apart to clean it, I see that it consists of four principal components: nib, cartridge, cap, and barrel. Were I to take those components themselves apart, I would discover that my fountain pen, which feels so stable in my hand, is actually an impermanent aggregate, to which the concept “fountain pen” has been applied. And though it appears independent, it is really a locus of interdependent causes and conditions, including the manufacturers who produced its resin, metal, and ink, the craftsman who assembled it, and of course Mr. Sakata himself. Far from being a separate entity, my pen might better be seen as an event in the ever-changing web of life. For all its beauty and functionality, it is void of solidity or intrinsic existence.

That is no small discovery. And were I to continue my investigation, examining my Sailor 1911 under an electron microsope, I would see that my so-called fountain pen is mostly energy and formless space. I would recognize the formlessness—or what Zen teachings call “emptiness”beneath the form. Through direct experience, I would have verified the core teaching of the Heart Sutra, which is chanted daily in Zen monasteries. “Form is no other than emptiness,” that sutra informs us, “emptiness no other than form”. A pen is indeed a pen, but it is also not a pen. And what is true of fountain pens is true of all phenomena, ourselves included.

To examine the world and the self in this fashion might seem a rather negative, if not destructive, enterprise, but in practice it is quite the opposite. It is as nurturing as it is liberating. In his book A New Earth, Eckhart Tolle explains:

Once you realize and accept that all structures (forms) are unstable, even the seemingly solid material ones, peace arises within you. This is because the recognition of the impermanence of all forms awakens you to the dimension of the formless within yourself, that which is beyond death.*

In Zen teachings, what Tolle describes as the “dimension of the formless” is usually called the “absolute” dimension. It is contrasted with the “relative” dimension, where a pen is a pen and a post is a post. In Zen training we are enjoined to see all things, including our bodies, thoughts, and feelings, from both perspectives. We cultivate a kind of double vision, seeing the changing and the changeless, the relative and the absolute, as two sides of a single coin. By so doing, we loosen our anxious attachments to things and thoughts and feelings, having recognized that ultimately there is nothing solid to be attached to, or any need to be attached. And if peace arises, as it often does, it is because at long last we are seeing things as they are.

_____________

*Eckhart Tolle, A New Earth (Penguin, 2005), 81.

6. Habit energies

Picture, if you will, a horse and rider. The horse is galloping down a road, and the rider is hanging on for dear life.

“Where are you going?”calls a man from the side of the road.

“I don’t know,” answers the rider. “Ask the horse.”

According to Zen teachings, the horse in this story represents the force of habit, or what Zen master Thich Nhat Hanh calls “habit energies.” Whether we’re aware of them or not, those energies drive our lives, even when we’re sleeping. They rush us into the future, and we may feel powerless to stop them. In his poem “Habits” the American poet W.S. Merwin acknowledges as much. “Even in the middle of the night,” he writes of his habits, “They go on handing me around.”*

I suspect that most of us are familiar with that experience. In my own case, I recall a Saturday afternoon when I found myself heading toward Wegman’s, though I was supposed to be driving to the Valu Home Center to buy some paint. My horse was a Honda Accord, but the pattern was much the same.

Habits may be pleasant, healthful, and productive. They may also protect us, or comfort us during a crisis. But habits of mind can dull our sensibilities and distort our perceptions of other people. And in the arts, they can harden into stylistic tics and conceptual cliches, impeding the creative spirit. Perhaps that is why Nadia Boulanger, the legendary teacher and composer, once declared that she loved tradition but despised habit.

In Zen practice we do not despise habit or consign it to a mental perdition. We do not try to transcend it. Rather, we sit still, cultivating an awareness of our breath, our bodies, our changing mental states. Over time, we may notice that certain patterns of thought and feeling arise again and again. We acknowledge their presence, as we might acknowledge bits of songs that come and go.”Hello, habit energies,” says Thich Nhat Hanh to his own.

This is a simple but potent practice, and as it deepens, we may find that the force of our habits diminishes proportionately. Where before there was only the habit, now there is both the habit and our awareness. And as we become ever more mindful, we empower ourselves to form new and more wholesome habits—and to drop those that do us harm.

If we continue to cultivate such awareness, we may discover that our habits have roots deeper and broader than the personal. They are grounded in our histories, familial and social, and they are fed by contemporary culture. In totalitarian countries, people live with the habit of suspicion. In our own, we are living with the habit of fear, whether its object be sickness, aging, a destitute retirement, or a terrorist attack. Every night, the news and the Big Pharma ads nourish that habit of feeling.

Zen is no remedy for cultural illness. Nor is meditation a magic cure for long-term addictions. But if we are diligent, Zen practice can release us from ingrained, corrosive habits of mind. We don’t have to drive to Wegman’s every Saturday afternoon. We don’t have to be afraid.

_______________

*W.S. Merwin, Writings to an Unfinished Accompaniment (Atheneum, 1973), 28.

5. Impermanence

If you are a homeowner in Alfred, New York, you may have heard of Orangeburg pipe. Widely used for drainage and sewer lines, it is best described as ten layers of tarpaper rolled up to form a pipe. Orangeburg takes its name from Orangeburg, New York, its point of manufacture. Properly seated in a bed of sand, Orangeburg might last fifty years. Or it might not.

Last month, I learned these facts the hard way. With little warning, our sewer line backed up, and our basement flooded. We called a plumber, and when his power snake brought back dirt, we knew we were in for some serious digging. Twenty-four hours later, in a trench where our lawn had been, we laid eyes on the cause of our misery. Sure enough, it was a length of Orangeburg pipe, flattened and degraded. Calling it a name not fit to print, I wondered why anyone would choose such a product, let alone trust it to last.

The answers weren’t far to seek. Orangeburg pipe gained popularity in the decade after World War II, when iron and steel were in short supply. Contractors liked it because it was user-friendly and readily available. Homeowners liked it because it was cheap. By the standards of its day, it was a serviceable product, if hardly top of the line. That it would one day fall apart was the future homeowner’s problem.

Whatever its merits as a plumbing component, Orangeburg pipe well illustrates a central focus of Zen training. For in Zen teachings we learn of “the impermanence of all conditioned things,” whether those things be our sewer lines, our bodies, our thoughts, our relationships, or our very lives. And in Zen practice, we come to know the truth of impermanence through direct experience.

That all things change is hardly breaking news. A few years ago, as I was waiting for a TV show to resume, the words “Embrace change” flashed on the screen. While that sounded like something a Zen master might say, the purveyor of this advice turned out to be Rochester Gas and Electric. It would seem that awareness of impermanence has at long last entered the American mainstream.

Yet it is one thing to have a conceptual understanding of impermanence and quite another to experience it concretely. In Zen meditation we cultivate a continuous awareness of impermanence not through the contemplation of lofty verities but through an intimate contact with changes as they are unfolding, moment by moment and breath by breath. We notice that no two breaths are quite the same. And if we are really paying attention, we notice that everything is changing, including our sensations, thoughts, feelings, and states of mind. Neither we nor the world’s bright things are as solid as we’d supposed.

It is not always pleasant to live with such awareness . We have every reason to resist it. Yet in the long run, if we can come to embody the truth of impermanence, we can align ourselves with the reality of change, and we can learn to live in harmony with its laws. For as Zen Master Thich Nhat Hanh reminds us, we suffer not because things are impermanent but because we expect them to be permanent when they are not. If we doubt that proposition, we have only to sit still for a while, following our breath and watching the changes within and around us.

Or, if we prefer, we can contemplate Orangeburg pipe

4. Zenlike Peace

Not so long ago, the journalist Michael Crowley, who was covering Hillary Clinton’s campaign for the New Republic, reported a conversation with the “makeup artist” in charge of preparing the candidates for the debates. Was Hillary a basket case, he asked, in those final moments before she went on? On the contrary, the makeup artist replied. “Sitting in the makeup chair seems to be one of the few moments of zenlike peace the candidates ever get.”*

Of all the images projected by the current presidential race, the spectacle of Hillary Clinton, John McCain, and the others sitting in “zenlike peace” in their makeup chairs is one of the more diverting. Yet if that image highlights a certain absurdity in the present campaign, it also reflects a popular view of Zen meditation. According to this view, to sit in zazen is to abide in perfect peace, untroubled by such things as one’s perilous standing in the polls. In the serene mind of the Zen practitioner, such worrisome thoughts—and thoughts in general—have ceased to exist, leaving a space as blank as an unmarked ballot.

Prevalent though they are, such perceptions of Zen attainment have little to do with the daily practice of Zen meditation. To be sure, Zen masters through the centuries have described the state of satori, in which ordinary, dualistic consciousness dissolves, and self and world become one. But as the modern Zen master Kosho Uchiyama warns us in his book Opening the Hand of Thought, “to think that people become great by doing zazen, or to think that you are going to gain satori, is to be sadly misled by your own illusion.”** For the aim of Zen practice is not to attain a state of continuous bliss or permanent contentment. Rather, it is to cultivate a clear and open awareness, within which transitory mental states, however calm or vexed, are recognized for what they are.

When practicing zazen, we adopt a stable, upright posture, aligning ourselves with the earth’s gravitational force. We settle into stillness, and we rest in awareness. Within that sky-like awareness, thoughts arrive and depart, as if they were passing clouds. Some are luminous and wispy, others dense and dark. But if we remain in awareness and do not pursue them, our thought-clouds leave as readily as they came. Uchiyama calls this process “opening the hand of thought,” and he describes it in this way:

When we let go of our conceptions, there is no other possible reality than what is right now. . . Dwelling here and now in this reality, letting go of all the accidental things that arise in our minds, is what I mean by “opening the hand of thought.” ***

Uchiyama contrasts this state of open awareness with our usual state of mind, in which we grasp at the objects of our thoughts, fashioning scenarios to suit our needs.

The difference may be illustrated by a simple example. Let us imagine that as Hillary Clinton sat in her makeup chair before the New Hampshire debate she had the thought, “Don’t forget to mention that Obama represented that louse Rezko in Chicago.” Were she to have pursued that thought, rehearsing her remarks, anticipating Obama’s response and planning her next move, she would merely have been thinking, strategically and analytically. She would have been living in the future. However, had she acknowledged her initial thought and let it go, returning to her breath and abiding in awareness, she would have indeed been cultivating a “zenlike peace,” and she would have also been practicing Zen meditation.

_____________

*Michael Crowley, “Hillary’s Non-muskie Moment,”  The Stump, January 7, 2008. http://www.tnr.com/blog/the-stump/hillarys-non-muskie-moment.

**Kosho Uchiyama, Opening the Hand of Thought (Wisdom, 2004), 18-19.

***Uchiyama,   12.

3. Village of Water

About ten years ago, I wrote a check for $ 57.00 to the Village of Water. At the time, I was attempting to pay my water bill. Oblivious of my oversight, I mailed the check, and somehow the Village of Alfred managed to cash it. When the bank returned the canceled check, as banks used to do, I discovered my blunder.

What was I thinking? I asked myself. Or as my mother would have said, Whatever possessed you? The script was neat, the handwriting definitely mine. The check bore my signature. But whoever wrote the “Village of Water” was miles away at the time.

However extreme, my error was not uncommon. Nor was it peculiar to professors. Quite possibly, the chickadees at our feeder and the deer who eat our dogwoods live continuously in the present. They have to. But we human beings have the option of being elsewhere, and that elsewhere is often the future or the past. And when we are not revisiting the past or rehearsing the future, we are often absorbed in abstract thought.

To return us to the present moment is the first purpose of Zen meditation. The Vietnamese Zen master Thich Nhat Hanh describes the practice in this way:

Meditation means you have to be present in the present moment. If the body is here but the mind is wandering elsewhere, in that moment you’re not present—you’re not present for yourself, and you’re not present for your husband, your children, your brothers or sisters, your nation, or your people. That is the opposite of meditation. Being present in the present moment means you are not being imprisoned by the past or sucked up by the future.

As Thich Nhat Hanh further explains, being present in the present moment does not preclude reflection, planning, or visionary thought. Rather, it returns the wandering mind, which doesn’t know it is wandering, to an awareness of whatever it is up to.

In Zen teachings, this capacity for being present is known as mindfulness, and it is an essential component of Zen discipline. Mindfulness may be cultivated in many ways, but at the beginning we can best develop it by sitting still, with our spines straight and the rest of our bodies relaxed. Maintaining that posture for ten, twenty, or thirty minutes, we bring a gentle, non-judgmental attention to our breath, our feelings, our passing thoughts, our changing states of mind. We become present for ourselves.

But can we also become present for other people? Beneficial though it is, the mindfulness cultivated in seated meditation is of limited value if it does not extend into our daily lives, where our presence—and often, our absence—profoundly affects others around us. “When you walk,” Zen teachers tell us, “just walk.” That admonishment directs us to give undivided attention to the one thing we are doing, be it cooking dinner, or writing a check, or listening to a friend. Mindfulness of this kind grows naturally from the habit of daily sitting, but it it may also be practiced by anyone at any time.

By way of demonstration, may I suggest that if you are drinking a cup of coffee while you are reading this column, put down your coffee and give full attention to the column. Or better yet, put down the column and give full attention to your coffee. Hold the cup in both hands, as Zen monks do, and inhale the aroma. Contemplate the origins, the history, and the nature of the drink you are about to ingest. Then drink your coffee, giving full attention to its taste. Continue this practice for a week or more, and see what you discover.