In the summer of 1965, shortly after my twenty-first birthday, I booked passage from London to New York on the Castel Felice, a storied old Sitmar liner with rock-bottom fares. For the previous nine months I had been an American student at the University of Leeds in West Yorkshire, England. Now I was coming home.
Midway through the ten-day voyage, something quietly momentous occurred. Winston Churchill once remarked that America and England are two nations separated by a common language. And during my time in England, although I shared a common tongue with my British hosts, I seldom forgot that I was a foreigner: a guest, as it were, of the British nation. But somewhere in the mid-Atlantic, I began to feel myself on native ground again. I began to feel like a host. And the British subjects on board, with whom I had many conversations about American culture, began to feel like my guests. Although it was never openly acknowledged, this reversal of roles could be felt in our language, our attitudes, even our demeanor. And the closer we came to the Statue of Liberty, the stronger the feeling grew.
Something analogous has been happening in American Zen. Recently Shohaku Okumura Roshi, an esteemed Zen master and abbot of the Sanshin Zen Community in Bloomington, Indiana, abandoned the lotus position, the traditional, cross-legged posture of Japanese Zen. He now sits in a chair. Likewise Susan Moon, an American writer and longtime Zen practitioner, has traded her traditional zafu (meditation cushion) for a straight-backed chair. In both instances, these decisions were driven by physical considerations. But in their broader cultural import, they might well be seen as symbolic.
For the past fifty years, American Zen has played guest to its foreign host, whose postures, forms, language, and liturgy it has struggled mightily to emulate and adopt. We Western practitioners have worn our hipparis and rakusus, our robes and tabi. We have chanted the Heart Sutra in Sino-Japanese. But slowly and sometimes painfully, American Zen has been coming into its own. Such unconventional practices as sitting zazen in a chair or chanting the sutras in English translation have been introduced in many Zen centers and widely, if sometimes reluctantly, accepted. Such adaptions are now no longer seen, as least by the more liberal-minded proponents of the practice, as concessions to comfort or as inauthentic, Western replicas of the real thing.
Looking back on my own essays on Zen practice, I see that they, too, reflect this tectonic shift. The Vietnamese Zen master Thich Nhat Hanh, to whom I have so often referred, went out of his way in his talks and writings to make the Asian practice of Zen palatable and accessible to interested Westerners. The word Zen was never mentioned; he spoke rather of “mindfulness” and the “energy of mindfulness.” Zazen became “seated meditation,” kinhin became “walking meditation,” and prostrations—that most foreign of Buddhist practices—became “touching the earth.” In this way “Thay,” as we called him, not only repackaged the practice. He also contributed, in no small measure, to its naturalization in the Western Hemisphere.
By and large, most of the leading Western teachers and writers on Zen—Zoketsu Norman Fischer, Roshi Joan Halifax, Charlotte Joko Beck, Edward Espe Brown, Zenkei Blanche Hartman, James Ishmael Ford, to name a few—have done the same. Their teachings and writings are deeply rooted in the traditional Asian teachings, particularly the seminal writings of Eihei Dogen (1200-1253), founder of the Soto tradition of Japanese Zen. But all of these teachers grew up in the United States and were conditioned by the mores, values, and language of mainstream Western culture. And in their talks and writings, they too have made an effort not only to translate the teachings into Western terms but to make this ennobling practice relevant and understandable to people living in our present place and time. Such terms as “ordinary Zen” and “everyday Zen” reinforce the image of a practice that originated in the East but has found a home and a nurturing environment in Western society.
To be sure, not every Zen practitioner is comfortable with this development. Those who assert that the full lotus is the only truly authentic Zen posture are unlikely to be at ease in such venues as the Ordinary Zen Sangha in Sarasota, Florida, which features on its website a photo of airport-style chairs lined up next to a wall on one side of its meditation hall and a row of zafus on tatami mats next to the facing wall. This image of an accommodating cultural change might also be read as a symptom of a deepening cultural divide: the innovators on the one side, the traditionalists on the other. Will that image prove to be a symbol of a broadening, inclusive practice—or a harbinger of a splintering spiritual community? I for one would hope that a strict and formal Eastern practice whose motto is “include everything” will find ample room for the West and its often informal ways.
______
Photo: The zendo of the Ordinary Zen Sangha, Sarasota, Florida. https://ordinaryzensangha.org/.
Your first paragraph about spending a school year in England and returning by steamship reawakened my memories of sailing on Holland-American Line steamships from New York to Rotterdam and back for the 62-63 academic year in a Dutch business school a few miles from Utrecht. It was a life-altering experience.
I will be 80 in a few months. I loved kneeling on my small wooden bench for a week of sesshin at Great Vow monastery here in Oregon. But somewhere around age 75, the pain and difficulty of kneeling for an hour or two at various times of the day got to be too much . So now I do my zazen sitting in a chair. It’s just not the same as kneeling on a bench (I never did master a full lotus position); but I’m not ready to give up zazen altogether.
Thanks for your lovely essay, Allen/Ryotetsu Whitaker-Emrich
Sent from my iPad
>
Allen – Thanks for your thoughtful note. I too have a seiza bench, a custom-made model with a thick, matching cushion. I use the bench from time to time, and it provides excellent alignment and lordosis, but eventually my calves complain of the pressure. The quarter-lotus, with a support cushion, is still comfortable enough for now, but I sometimes resort to a piano bench with adjustable height. If you haven’t yet tried one, I would recommend giving it a try. Good luck with your practice.
Hi Ben, I always appreciate your beautiful posts. And this one feels especially timely, as we sit our way towards an American expression of Zen. At my center in Arizona, where the majority of practitioners are over 70 years of age, chairs are the norm. Naturally, we’ve invested in really excellent chairs!! (Black, of course.) The Kwan Um tradition teaches that correct meditation does not depend on how the body is arranged — it’s how we keep the mind, moment to moment. Still, many of us (me!) remain attached to Asian forms. I’m still on that “other shore.”
Nice to hear from you, Barry. The last I heard, you were in Cambridge, Massachusetss. What you report–chairs being the norm–is guite amazing, given the state of the practice twenty years ago, when even a seiza bench was considered by some to be less than de rigueur. I’m curious to know what kind of chairs you have and whether you put a zafu on top of the seat. For my own part, I still use a zafu most of the time but sometimes use a piano bench, which allows me to adjust the height. Apropos of “the other shore,” might you be familiar with Liz Story’s piano piece “The Other Shore”? It’s a sombre piece, somewhat reminiscent of Brahms. As you may know, she too lives in Arizona. As for the arrangement of the meditating body, Thich Nhat Hanh used to refer jokingly to the “chrysanthemum position,” meaning “legs any which way.” He too felt that the state of one’s mind was far more important than the placement of one’s legs. Be well. Ben.
Hi Ben, How are you? I moved to Bisbee Arizona four years ago, 8 miles from the border, 5,400 ft elevation. In this small mountain town we have Cochise Zen Center — about 25 members. Only sangha for 100 miles. We use “Mity-Lite Flex One Folding” chairs, available for a good price on Amazon: https://amzn.to/3klW2Sw. They are remarkably comfortable for sitting meditation, without cushions. Thanks for the reference to “The Other Shore” — I’ll definitely listen. And thank you for your work. Barry
Barry Briggs makes a good point of the immediate Buddha mind of Whating This Thus as the essence of zazen, regardless of how the body is arranged.
Richard – Thanks for your response. I confess I’m not familiar with “Whating This Thus.” Could you explain?
If we don’t adapt we fail. Zen is living breathing and being in the moment. Hence the instantaneous Buddha mind.